Skip to main content

Strategy

Power and institutions

Understand who can block or support a reform and build coalitions and institutional vehicles without treating every objection as bad faith.

The proposal

Map veto players, opposition, first movers, coalitions and legal-financial vehicles without attributing bad faith to every objection.

How to read it

Sources identify relevant rights, methods, findings or precedents. They do not automatically establish the full World4Humans formulation. Where the project makes its own choice, that choice remains open to criticism and revision.

Sources and literature

Authority
World4Humans proposal informed by external precedents.
Relationship
The source is a useful analogue or precedent, not demonstrated equivalence.

Cited publications

  • Gilens & Page, 2014

    Gilens, Martin & Benjamin I. Page. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–581. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/testing-theories-of-american-politics-elites-interest-groups-and-average-citizens/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B

  • Scheve & Stasavage, 2017

    Scheve, Kenneth & David Stasavage. 2017. “Wealth Inequality and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 20. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061014-101840

See verified sources

Related entries